Solve the debate of Connection Max Length #22

Closed
opened 2020-07-14 00:34:01 +00:00 by sarah · 1 comment
Owner

Currently this is hardcoded to something suitable for p2p connections (1kb), but server connections in cwtch (for historical reasons) permit a much larger message size.

We should work out if we want to support the dichotomy through configurablenss (as originally intended), or through some other mechanism.

Currently this is hardcoded to something suitable for p2p connections (1kb), but server connections in cwtch (for historical reasons) permit a much larger message size. We should work out if we want to support the dichotomy through configurablenss (as originally intended), or through some other mechanism.
sarah changed title from Solve the debat of Connection Max Length to Solve the debate of Connection Max Length 2020-07-14 00:49:17 +00:00
Author
Owner

8192 bytes should be enough for anyone (until we get a better overlay network)

8192 bytes should be enough for anyone (until we get a better overlay network)
sarah closed this issue 2022-10-25 18:48:20 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: cwtch.im/tapir#22
No description provided.