Peer History Save & Lists Refresh #315

Merged
dan merged 2 commits from peer-save into master 2020-07-21 18:15:11 +00:00
Owner

This is based on the blocked changes and my list sketch so it's a little cluttered, will be queued behind the others and then I will rebase

This is based on the blocked changes and my list sketch so it's a little cluttered, will be queued behind the others and then I will rebase
dan was assigned by sarah 2020-07-09 20:40:40 +00:00
Member

Drone Build Status: failure

https://build.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/ui/605

Drone Build Status: failure https://build.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/ui/605
Member

Drone Build Status: failure

https://build.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/ui/611

Drone Build Status: failure https://build.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/ui/611
sarah changed title from WIP: peer-save to Peer History Save & Lists Refresh 2020-07-21 00:08:44 +00:00
Member

Drone Build Status: success

https://build.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/ui/613

Drone Build Status: success https://build.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/ui/613
dan reviewed 2020-07-21 18:05:33 +00:00
go/ui/gcd.go Outdated
@ -350,2 +352,3 @@
this.SupplyPeerSettings(contact.Onion, name, string(contact.Authorization))
// Whether Cwtch should save the history of the peer
saveHistory,exists := contact.GetAttribute(event.SaveHistoryKey)

ah. I have a quibble about this but its also an oversight on my part from the cwtch PR about this. mostly we've been doing

peer.GetAttribute(attr.GetSettingsScope(constants.ShowBlocked))

wrapping keys in a certain scope, not just leaving them "scopeless" in the attribute space, but I missed this in cwtch.im/cwtch#316

So not sure if you feel it's worth going back to bring in line or just let be

ah. I have a quibble about this but its also an oversight on my part from the cwtch PR about this. mostly we've been doing ```peer.GetAttribute(attr.GetSettingsScope(constants.ShowBlocked))``` wrapping keys in a certain scope, not just leaving them "scopeless" in the attribute space, but I missed this in https://git.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/cwtch/pulls/316 So not sure if you feel it's worth going back to bring in line or just let be
@ -26,3 +27,1 @@
style: CwtchTextFieldStyle{}
visible:listpanel.online

we prolly want to move this up a level, making each overlay handle offline/online seems like a painful duplication, could just pull out of this PR for now if it's a problem?

we prolly want to move this up a level, making each overlay handle offline/online seems like a painful duplication, could just pull out of this PR for now if it's a problem?
@ -111,2 +140,4 @@
txtDisplayName.text = nick
root.authorization = authorization
root.saveHistory = saveHistory
console.log(root.saveHistory)

don't need this console.log

don't need this console.log
dan merged commit 08722d7b97 into master 2020-07-21 18:15:10 +00:00
Member

Drone Build Status: success

https://build.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/ui/615

Drone Build Status: success https://build.openprivacy.ca/cwtch.im/ui/615
This repo is archived. You cannot comment on pull requests.
No description provided.