From 2648a6266ce5f17df0f7861bc2e4f815de511ef0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roger Dingledine Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:24:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] on further looking, r10835 doesn't need a backport. i think. svn:r10850 --- doc/TODO.012 | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/TODO.012 b/doc/TODO.012 index 7a8b0b4c4..699f2b713 100644 --- a/doc/TODO.012 +++ b/doc/TODO.012 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Backport items for 0.1.2: o r10790: Don't include reasons in destroy cells from the origin. o Some fix for bug 455. o r10830 if nick thinks it's a real fix - - r10835 if nick thinks it's a real fix + X r10835 (no need to backport i think, the code is way different) Backport for 0.1.2.x once better tested: