fix up a confusion on the release notes (thanks karsten)

svn:r15793
2008-07-09 12:36:26 +00:00 · 2008-07-09 12:36:26 +00:00 · 33a1210ec3
parent 4a16d044fc
commit 33a1210ec3
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
--- a/2
+++ b/2
@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ Changes in version 0.2.0.9-alpha - 2007-10-24
      "Unnamed". Now we can list servers that happen to pick the same
      nickname as a server that registered two years ago and then
      disappeared. Partially implements proposal 122.
-    - If the consensus list a router as "Unnamed", the name is assigned
+    - If the consensus lists a router as "Unnamed", the name is assigned
      to a different router: do not identify the router by that name.
      Partially implements proposal 122.
    - Authorities can now come to a consensus on which method to use to
--- a/6
+++ b/6
@ -226,9 +226,9 @@ Changes in version 0.2.0.30 - 2008-07-xx
      at least 100KB/s, and consider their bandwidth adequate to be a
      Guard if it is at least 250KB/s, no matter the medians. This fix
      complements proposal 107.
-    - Directory authorities now never mark more than 3 servers per IP as
-      Valid and Running. Implements proposal 109, by Kevin Bauer and
-      Damon McCoy.
+    - Directory authorities now never mark more than 2 servers per IP as
+      Valid and Running (or 5 on addresses shared by authorities).
+      Implements proposal 109, by Kevin Bauer and Damon McCoy.
    - If we're a relay, avoid picking ourselves as an introduction point,
      a rendezvous point, or as the final hop for internal circuits. Bug
      reported by taranis and lodger.