From 881f7157f648eb8a39e5dfd3efb95951ee7ac215 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Mathewson Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 11:39:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Return -1 from our PEM password callback Apparently, contrary to its documentation, this is how OpenSSL now wants us to report an error. Fixes bug 26116; bugfix on 0.2.5.16. --- changes/bug26116 | 7 +++++++ src/common/crypto.c | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 changes/bug26116 diff --git a/changes/bug26116 b/changes/bug26116 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3bfde74f7 --- /dev/null +++ b/changes/bug26116 @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ + o Minor bugfixes (compatibility, openssl): + - Work around a change in OpenSSL 1.1.1 where + return values that would previously indicate "no password" now + indicate an empty password. Without this workaround, Tor instances + running with OpenSSL 1.1.1 would accept descriptors that other Tor + instances would reject. Fixes bug 26116; bugfix on 0.2.5.16. + diff --git a/src/common/crypto.c b/src/common/crypto.c index 39c8cc2b0..f8495bb10 100644 --- a/src/common/crypto.c +++ b/src/common/crypto.c @@ -653,7 +653,12 @@ pem_no_password_cb(char *buf, int size, int rwflag, void *u) (void)size; (void)rwflag; (void)u; - return 0; + /* The openssl documentation says that a callback "must" return 0 if an + * error occurred. But during the 1.1.1 series (commit c82c3462267afdbbaa5 + * they changed the interpretation so that 0 indicates an empty password and + * -1 indicates an error. We want to reject any encrypted PEM buffers, so we + * return -1. This will work on older OpenSSL versions and LibreSSL too. */ + return -1; } /** Read a PEM-encoded private key from the len-byte string s