on further looking, r10835 doesn't need a backport. i think.

svn:r10850
2007-07-17 07:24:37 +00:00 · 2007-07-17 07:24:37 +00:00 · 2648a6266c
parent eb576f0a18
commit 2648a6266c
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
--- a/doc/TODO.012
+++ b/doc/TODO.012
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Backport items for 0.1.2:
  o r10790: Don't include reasons in destroy cells from the origin.
  o Some fix for bug 455.
  o r10830 if nick thinks it's a real fix
-  - r10835 if nick thinks it's a real fix
+  X r10835 (no need to backport i think, the code is way different)


 Backport for 0.1.2.x once better tested: